• Home
  • US Politics
  • Business & Economy
  • UK & Welsh Politics
  • Reflections On...
  • Video Archive
US Politics

McCain Can’t Afford To Drop Sarah - They Won’t Let Him Anyways

Posted on 03 October 2008 by Charley James

John McCain and Sarah Palin

by Charley James

Despite numerous calls from serious conservative columnists over the last week for John McCain to drop Sarah Palin from the Republican ticket, she’s not going anywhere regardless of her debate performance.

“She’s our lifeline to the money coming in from evangelicals and the far right,” says my contact at McCain headquarters in Virginia. “Without their cash, the campaign would be struggling to raise money. McCain can’t afford to drop Sarah.

“Don’t take this the wrong way but Palin is, well, she’s our cash cow,” he tells me, somewhat embarrassed at his awkward metaphor.

As I reported on Sept. 26 and again on Sept. 27, two sources inside the McCain campaign, and three inside Barack Obama’s, are providing me with information for a book I want to write after the election. 

The McCain headquarters source is someone I’ve known for roughly 30 years and has been my interpreter of the conservative movement ever since. Along with a woman I dated centuries ago who works in a key swing state campaign office, I’ve had a unique, insider’s look at the McCain operation since the primaries.

“Besides, they won’t let him anyway. (Grover) Norquist, (James) Dobson, Roger Ayles and Karl (Rove) would strangle McCain if he dumped her,” he confides. “Quiet word around here is they’re the ones who told McCain he couldn’t have Lieberman and pushed Palin on us.” 

Say That Again?

Wait. This is news! John McCain did not choose his own vice presidential candidate?

Until now, the McCain campaign’s public posture is that McCain selected her based on a short meeting he had with her a year or two ago at a National Governor’s Assn. meeting and then summoned her to Arizona for the now-famous four hour chat. I beg my contact to let me use this piece of information now. Our ground rules are that nothing I am told can be published until after Nov. 4, a rule that three of my contacts allowed me to bend slightly for last week’s two articles.

“Yeah, why not,” he agrees after a somewhat lengthy pause. “It can’t hurt us now anymore than everything else that’s happening.”

The four evil names rattle around in my head: Rove, Ayles, Dobson and Norquist. 

Finally, the choice of Palin makes some sense; not much, but some. Yet it was clear right from the start that McCain was doing somebody’s bidding in choosing an unknown lightweight governor to be his running mater. It turns out that the esteemed doyens of the right wingnut fringe of the Republican Party – Norquist and his once all-powerful “Americans For Tax Reform,” James Dobson’s hate-mongering “Focus On The Family,” Roger Ayles and his Republican talking point network Fox News, and Karl “Bush’s Brain” Rove – did the choosing. Talk about king makers or, in this case, queen makers. McCain managed to go through the motions of “interviewing” Palin but, apparently, he had as much say in the process as I did.

I ask my friend if this is rumor, an open secret or confirmed fact.

“It’s an open secret about a rumor that’s been rumbling around here for weeks,” he tells me somewhat vaguely. Then he adds an even more cryptic comment, “Would I go to Atlantic City with McCain and place a bet on it? Probably, but I’m not sure.”

The half-hearted joke referred to McCain’s fondness for high stakes  casino gambling and his deep connections to casino lobbyists was revealed in several articles this week in The New York Times. 

Gruesome Implications
I don’t put much stock in conspiracy theories but, if this one is true, it has truly gruesome implications for the country.

Assuming that McCain won’t live out his term, then Sarah Palin and her own, living, breathing handmaiden’s tale would become president. A Tabula Rosa on which the known and unknown manipulators of far right policies and politics would be able to write large their own vision of America – a vision that does not include anything close to mainstream political thought on either side of the political spectrum. 

Compared to a Pres. Palin, by comparison George Bush would seem like a Renaissance man, a 21st century Thomas Jefferson.

Suddenly, Naomi Wolf’s draconia vision (www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/the-battle-plan-ii-sarah_b_128393.html) of the United States under another Republican president seems much more frighteningly real than it did yesterday.

True, there’ve always been insiders working the strings in American politics, starting with Mark Hannah in Ohio during the McKinley administration to New York City’s Tammany Hall and Harold Ickes to Arthur Goldberg. But they’ve always been mainstream people who generally had the country’s best interests at heart. Not in the history of the United States have a cabal of extremists gathered so much power inside a seemingly mainstream political party that they literally dictated to a party’s presidential nominee who would be his running mate simply because it suited their own, perverse end.

Merriam-Webster.com defines a maverick “an independent individual who does not go along with a group or party.” So much for McCain’s self-professed image of being a “maverick.” Nowhere in American history can I find a reference to a politician so craven that he allows his desire for the presidency to be bastardized – swallowed whole – by powerful fringe elements of his party.

The news about how Sarah Palin came to be the Republican Party’s vice presidential candidate is not just disturbing, it is terrifying. How did this happen in America? Hopefully, as the remaining days of the campaign slide past, enough Americans will shake their heads in disbelief at both McCain and Palin – each person having their own reason – and shout “Enough!” as they pull the Obama-Biden lever in the voting booth.

The Grand Old Party was founded by Abraham Lincoln. Somewhere, the nation’s greatest single president is weeping.

Share and Enjoy:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Mixx

Charley James is an American journalist, writer and blogger (http://thepoliticalcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/) who lives in Toronto.
Email this author | All posts by Charley James

Comments are closed.

Saturday, 4th July 2009



Live Political Twitter Feed

Wilderness Dispatches

facebook-friends Wiley and Non Squitur cuts too close to the quick for many.

Advertisers

Follow and Bookmark us






Bookmark and Share

Tags

Al Gore BBC Bill Clinton Charley James clinton CNN David Cameron democratic party democrats Denis Campbell Dick Cheney FOX FOX News George Bush George W. Bush Georgia GOP Gordon Brown Iraq Joe Biden John McCain Karl Rove Keith Olbermann London McCain MSNBC NBC New York Times obama Palin President Obama Republicans Rush Limbaugh Sarah Palin super delegates Tesco The Netherlands Tony Blair Tories Twitter UK vadimus post Wales White House Yahoo!

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.



Friends

LA ProgressiveProPublica
Divazzy
Grainger and Whitney
Panoramic TVCambria Politico

Contributors

Dr Anthony Asadullah SamadCarl MatthesCharley JamesDavid Swanson
Denis CampbellDick PriceDorret Groot WassinkKevin Lynn
Madeleine Begun KaneMonroe AndersonMarcus SternMark leVine
Robert ReichRev. Monroe AndersonSherwood RossSharon Kyle

Links

BBC NewsCambria PoliticoThe Colbert Report
Countdown with keith OlbermenCSpanDenis Campbell : An American In Wales
Energy Grid MagazineThe GuardianLAProgressive
Mad Kane’s Political Madness
Monroe AndersonThe Huffington Post
The IndependantJamie & LouiseMad Kane
MSNBCNew York Times OnlineProgressive Curmudgeon
The Daily ShowTED.com - Ideas Worth SpreadingThe Telegraph
ViaMichelinWall Street Journal

Browse Archives


About The UKProgressive

UK Progressive E-Magazine began during the 2008 US Presidential Campaign and was created to consolidate and replace two blogs created in 2006 called “Outside the Boundaries,” a political blog and “Fire the Guru!” an expose blog of charlatans in the Mind Body Spirit business. It was briefly called The Vadimus Post. That name came from the Latin 'Quo Vadimus' or 'Where Are We Headed?'

When looking for pithy Latin URL names, I’d watched a moving episode of the same name (different tense, Quo Vadis) from Sports Night, an early series created by The West Wing’s Aaron Sorkin. It was the last episode and focused on the sale of the network to an unknown billionaire who asked the question every day of those who worked closest to him. He wanted to know the answer and… Do We Know Why? His rationale: we spend so much time on things urgent, we miss the important and do we ask ourselves (and others) why we are heading in a particular direction?

Well that is what we ask in these Op-Ed pieces, articles, live feeds, video segments and contributions from friends and affiliates. We are blessed to be able to dialogue with you and our aim is to provide independent, critical insight into the issues of the day. UK Progressive is published daily in Monknash, South Wales. Its founder, An American in Wales, is US journalist Denis Campbell who has been based in The Netherlands and the UK the last 11-years.

The opinions expressed are those of each contributor and do not represent the opinion of Denis Campbell (unless expressly authored by him), our advertisers, any related companies and/or their affiliates. This website is copyright protected by various submitting authors, is reproduced with their permission and we operate under a Creative Commons licence that allows for our content to be re-published for non-commercial, non-derivative use, without editing, or changing and that credit be provided to UK Progressive with a track back URL and, where specified, the individual writer's website link. Thank you and welcome.

Donate


UK Progressive is a free, continuously improving news distribution service (because none of us could live with ourselves or face our mothers if every edition did not represent our very best effort). A lot of work goes daily into producing this true labour of love.

While most of us have other day jobs to eat, we’d love to get to the point where we can monetize this so it covers all of our expenses, allows us to pay our contributors for their fine work and helps us to continue to expand and grow. While not like PBS or other media groups shilling for logo umbrellas every ten minutes, we find it embarrassing to even have to ask… and we could use your help.

If you like what you see here and would like to help us bring it to you by making a donation to support future developments, well, we’d really appreciate it. Our PayPal account is named after a lovely canal side café in Lochem, The Netherlands which our office overlooked years ago.

We promise a team cheer and ‘happy dance’ in your name in advance. Thanks.



License


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.


Copyright 2009 UKProgressive     Contact Us | About Us | Terms and ConditionsWebsite by Divazzy | Branding by Grainger and Whitney | Video Production by Panoramic TV | EversonNews Theme by Everson