• Home
  • US Politics
  • Business & Economy
  • UK & Welsh Politics
  • Reflections On...
  • Video Archive
US Politics

Grandpa and the Beauty Queen

Posted on 30 August 2008 by Charley James

By Charley James
Watching John McCain hug Sarah Palin yesterday was almost creepy: It was like seeing an old man not fit to be president copping a feel off a woman roughly half his age who’s not fit to be vice president. Eerily, it happened a few days after McCain turned 72 and the day before Michael Jackson turned 50.

Alright, that’s out of my system.

While McCain’s choice for vice president may energise the Republican Party’s shrinking base and shore up his credentials with the one issue evangelicals who drive the party’s platform, the Hail Mary pass her selection represents is the best indication yet that John McCain will do and say anything to win the election. (Of course, in a way it’s not surprising since some of his fellow Hanoi Hilton residents still insist he did and said anything to get better treatment as a POW.) So much for McCain’s remaining shards of integrity.

As Gail Collins points out in today’s New York Times, McCain’s blatant pandering to women is an insult to their intelligence. Yet Janice Shaw Crouse of the far right group Concerned Women for America said in a statement yesterday, “How refreshing that now we have a woman who reflects the values of mainstream American women.”

Oh, really? How mainstream can Palin be when polling reveals her positions are the exact opposite of “mainstream American women?”

The vast majority of American women want to have the freedom of choice over their own bodies.

Mainstream American women are deeply concerned about the environment, which Palin – like McCain – doesn’t believe is under any serious threat as she urges intense ANWAR drilling, claims climate change is a fiction and doesn’t think Polar Bears need protecting.

Mainstream women want the troops – their sons and daughters – out of Iraq, and right now.

Mainstream women are concerned about gun violence in cities.

They want to be paid the same as men and have the same opportunities, something Palin has never said she supports.

Mainstream American women want the federal government to spend money on health care, and schools while Palin supported spending hundreds of millions on the “Bridge to Nowhere” before she opposed it.

Mainstream American women are terrified that Social Security won’t be there at retirement because, the way things are going, IRA’s and 401(k) plans will be completely devalued and private pensions washed away in a tide of corporate bankruptcies while Palin has never uttered a word about the uneconomic security choking the country.

No wonder McCain picked Palin: She’s able to alter positions on a dime, depending on which way the political winds are blowing. Would that the Exxon-Valdize been that maneuverable.

Mainstream American women want a vice president whose experience includes more than simply 20 years as a hockey mom, a few years as a semi-full time mayor of a tiny Alaskan town and not quite 18 months as governor of a state whose population is less than that of many Congressional districts in the “lower 48.”

The risk Democrats face with Palin is three-fold: Underestimating her (which isn’t hard to do), dismissing her as a Dan Quayle joke (which she is) or thinking that simply exposing facts about Palin and her lack of depth, experience, knowledge or understanding of the world will overshadow in people’s minds the way they actually vote: On emotion as much as facts.

What can be of use is that she’s made plenty of trouble for herself back in Alaska. In a state rife with Republican corruption, she brushes against it. And she has a short fuse with a stubborn streak straight out of the Bush mold. For example, in August the Anchorage Daily News wrote that Palin revealed her ugly side during the Troopergate scandal, adding “… Sarah Palin is not handling pressure well.”

The paper adds that she reacted to sharp criticism of her attempt to get a state trooper, a former sort-of relative, fired, by “Portray(ing) the brave men and women of the Alaska State Troopers as weak because they are afraid of losing their jobs and their ability to feed their families. What’s wrong with these guys?”

Sound familiar? We’ve heard the same insults from The White House and Republicans in Congress for years.

Sarah Palin is not a “fresh face.” She’s simply another version of the same old same old the GOP and Bush White House has given us for eight years.

Share and Enjoy:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Mixx

Charley James is an American journalist, writer and blogger (http://thepoliticalcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/) who lives in Toronto.
Email this author | All posts by Charley James

Comments are closed.

Saturday, 4th July 2009



Live Political Twitter Feed

Wilderness Dispatches

One of the few times I will ever say the words wow, good job and FOX in the same sentence. Great story well reported.

Advertisers

Follow and Bookmark us






Bookmark and Share

Tags

Al Gore BBC Bill Clinton Charley James clinton CNN David Cameron democratic party democrats Denis Campbell Dick Cheney FOX FOX News George Bush George W. Bush Georgia GOP Gordon Brown Iraq Joe Biden John McCain Karl Rove Keith Olbermann London McCain MSNBC NBC New York Times obama Palin President Obama Republicans Rush Limbaugh Sarah Palin super delegates Tesco The Netherlands Tony Blair Tories Twitter UK vadimus post Wales White House Yahoo!

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.



Friends

LA ProgressiveProPublica
Divazzy
Grainger and Whitney
Panoramic TVCambria Politico

Contributors

Dr Anthony Asadullah SamadCarl MatthesCharley JamesDavid Swanson
Denis CampbellDick PriceDorret Groot WassinkKevin Lynn
Madeleine Begun KaneMonroe AndersonMarcus SternMark leVine
Robert ReichRev. Monroe AndersonSherwood RossSharon Kyle

Links

BBC NewsCambria PoliticoThe Colbert Report
Countdown with keith OlbermenCSpanDenis Campbell : An American In Wales
Energy Grid MagazineThe GuardianLAProgressive
Mad Kane’s Political Madness
Monroe AndersonThe Huffington Post
The IndependantJamie & LouiseMad Kane
MSNBCNew York Times OnlineProgressive Curmudgeon
The Daily ShowTED.com - Ideas Worth SpreadingThe Telegraph
ViaMichelinWall Street Journal

Browse Archives


About The UKProgressive

UK Progressive E-Magazine began during the 2008 US Presidential Campaign and was created to consolidate and replace two blogs created in 2006 called “Outside the Boundaries,” a political blog and “Fire the Guru!” an expose blog of charlatans in the Mind Body Spirit business. It was briefly called The Vadimus Post. That name came from the Latin 'Quo Vadimus' or 'Where Are We Headed?'

When looking for pithy Latin URL names, I’d watched a moving episode of the same name (different tense, Quo Vadis) from Sports Night, an early series created by The West Wing’s Aaron Sorkin. It was the last episode and focused on the sale of the network to an unknown billionaire who asked the question every day of those who worked closest to him. He wanted to know the answer and… Do We Know Why? His rationale: we spend so much time on things urgent, we miss the important and do we ask ourselves (and others) why we are heading in a particular direction?

Well that is what we ask in these Op-Ed pieces, articles, live feeds, video segments and contributions from friends and affiliates. We are blessed to be able to dialogue with you and our aim is to provide independent, critical insight into the issues of the day. UK Progressive is published daily in Monknash, South Wales. Its founder, An American in Wales, is US journalist Denis Campbell who has been based in The Netherlands and the UK the last 11-years.

The opinions expressed are those of each contributor and do not represent the opinion of Denis Campbell (unless expressly authored by him), our advertisers, any related companies and/or their affiliates. This website is copyright protected by various submitting authors, is reproduced with their permission and we operate under a Creative Commons licence that allows for our content to be re-published for non-commercial, non-derivative use, without editing, or changing and that credit be provided to UK Progressive with a track back URL and, where specified, the individual writer's website link. Thank you and welcome.

Donate


UK Progressive is a free, continuously improving news distribution service (because none of us could live with ourselves or face our mothers if every edition did not represent our very best effort). A lot of work goes daily into producing this true labour of love.

While most of us have other day jobs to eat, we’d love to get to the point where we can monetize this so it covers all of our expenses, allows us to pay our contributors for their fine work and helps us to continue to expand and grow. While not like PBS or other media groups shilling for logo umbrellas every ten minutes, we find it embarrassing to even have to ask… and we could use your help.

If you like what you see here and would like to help us bring it to you by making a donation to support future developments, well, we’d really appreciate it. Our PayPal account is named after a lovely canal side café in Lochem, The Netherlands which our office overlooked years ago.

We promise a team cheer and ‘happy dance’ in your name in advance. Thanks.



License


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.


Copyright 2009 UKProgressive     Contact Us | About Us | Terms and ConditionsWebsite by Divazzy | Branding by Grainger and Whitney | Video Production by Panoramic TV | EversonNews Theme by Everson