John McCain is sneaking up on Barack Obama in the latest still-too-early-to-mean-much polls. But what is meaningful is that around 30% of former Clinton supporters are still declaring themselves as undecided or supporting McCain.
To those people, I have three words to think about as the convention convenes in Denver: Supreme Court appointments.
If you sit out this election or vote for McCain and he wins, he will appoint at least one and possibly two people to Supreme Court of the United States during his first term. And I guarantee you he won’t be nominating people like Hillary or Barack.
This means a lot to everyone, and especially women.
It will mean Roe v. Wade and a woman’s control over her own body will be gone, probably within two years. It means that the growing backlog of lower court decisions on women’s rights in the workplace, especially those involving pay, promotion, discrimination and harassment will go against women in favor of corporate interests. It means conservatives dominating the court will successfully dissemble the Bill of Rights as narrow minorities on the bench tried and failed to do – usually by one vote – in the Gitmo cases over the past two years.
Essentially, it means all of the gains in women’s rights over the past half-century will be at risk as a lop-sided, right wing court recasts the face of America into something not just you but your daughters and their daughters will be forced to live.
I understand you’re disappointed that your candidate lost. But more often than not, politics – like life itself – is disappointing. Had Hilary run a better campaign, had she better senior advisors, had Mark Penn not gone public with every internal dispute he was losing to Terry McAuliffe (and vice versa), if her staff with all of its pre-primary polling had understood that change trumped experience this time around, had she been a better candidate, had Bill stayed on message and not tossed out subtle racial smears, things might have been different.
Might-a. Could-a. Should-a.
Simply put, Obama was the better candidate with the better run, better organized, better funded campaign. Party insiders did not give Obama the nomination. Chris Mathews did not up-end the Clinton effort. The news media did not have it in for her. It wasn’t sexism among voters or reporters; I promise you that people who would not vote for a woman would not vote for a black man, either.
I have covered state and national campaigns since Nixon beat Humphrey way back in 1968. I’ve learned in watching the best (and, more often, the worst) politicians is they remember the old saw about “politics makes strange bedfellows.” When they lose, they lick their wounds and then close ranks to win the election.
If you truly think John McCain would be better for America than Barack Obama, then vote for him. But if you’re voting for him out of spite, or not voting at all as an ill-advised protest, remember another old adage: Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face.”
You won’t like what you see staring back at you in the mirror.
You have to wonder how genuinely liberal Hilary Clinton really is, if so many of her supporters, especially women, are willing to see McCain elected, even if they don’t actually vote for him (and also not for Obama.) To accept a right-wing warmonger who will strip women of their right to choose, then ensure that their children are wound up in perpetual wars is unthinkable — unless they, any by extension, Hilary, are right wing warmongers too. (We already know that Mark Penn, her chief strategist, is a right wing warmongering bigot.)
I can’t believe so many of Clinton’s supporters agree with Mark Penn. (Why don’t they pay off the money the campaign owes him?)